On Saturday 12 January 2008 00:20, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Robert Hailey wrote: > > > > > I had just translated this bug to the prioritized queue... I kept the > > logic the same, but I knew it didn't look right! > > > > All messages requeued in the past before r17024 (which is to say, a > > lot of messages, because nodes are busy), are requeued in the reverse > > order. Statistically, they may be requeued again (and flipped back). > > > > With this bug gone (plus the priority queue) the insanely-long- > > request- > > searching has vanished! > > > > -- > > Robert Hailey > > > I'm excited. If the speed of the simulator after r17025 is any > indication of the overall freenet performance, wow... > > Inserts dropped from 28 seconds to 8 seconds (x3.5). Can't really > measure requests, though, as they are already so fast in the > simulator; but now they don't randomly hang of course.
Fascinating. I'm surprised that it had such a strong effect - how much of this is due to prioritising and how much due to queue reversal? With prioritisation I'd expect the non-bulk queues to get flushed fairly quickly, no?
pgpQQepUPfVDp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
