On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:24, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Maybe we should have a longer timeout on SSKInsertRequest? It's as > > big as a > > bulk datum, but it's done in a regular request, with (presumably) a > > short > > timeout ... I don't like the idea of making it stick out on traffic > > analysis, > > but I don't like the idea of it timing out more often than other > > requests > > either... We can either move it up to HIGH, or we can have a very long > > timeout on SSK inserts?? > > Rather than moving it from BULK_DATA, I would favor the longer timeout.
You're probably right. Do you want me to do it?
pgpGB0lufvANB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
