On Thursday 21 February 2008 17:28, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > What exactly are you simulating here? > > Sorry for breaking the thread, I deleted the email I was supposed to be > replying to. I'm simulating what happens when a node only tries to > minimise its distance to its neighbours when deciding whether to swap, > rather than minimising the product of its own and the swap partner's > distance. > > There was a bug in my first attempt so please ignore those results. The > second attempt shows that swapping this way is significantly less effective.
How significantly? It might still be an option if it's just a constant factor less powerful ... but if it gets stuck in false minima and is even worse scalability then it's not acceptable. > > Cheers, > Michael
pgpExcUWQaGNm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
