On Tuesday 11 March 2008 15:56, Robert Hailey wrote:
> Input Rate: 24.5 KiB/sec (of 781 KiB)
> Output Rate: 39.7 KiB/sec (of 30.0 KiB)
> Total Input: 1.60 GiB (21.4 KiB/sec)
> Total Output: 2.39 GiB (32.1 KiB/sec)
> Payload Output: 1.10 GiB (14.7 KiB/sec)(46%)
> Request output (excluding payload): CHK 225 MiB SSK 423 MiB.
> Insert output (excluding payload): CHK 65.8 MiB SSK 7.01 MiB.
> Offered keys: sending keys 16.2 MiB, sending offers 7.16 MiB
> Swapping Output: 16.7 MiB.
> Connection setup: 4.59 MiB output
> Ack-only packets: 377 MiB
> Resent bytes: 187 MiB
> Updater Output: 0 B
> Announcement output: 1.05 MiB
> Admin bytes: 77.6 KiB initial messages, 4.06 KiB IP change messages,  
> 9.42 KiB disconnection notifications, 0 B routing status
> Debugging bytes: 0 B network coloring, 0 B ping, 26.1 KiB probe  
> requests, 0 B routed test messages.
> Node to node messages: 67.2 KiB
> Other output: -8375632 B (0%)
> 
> --build #1122 (+/-)--
> 
> I like the added stats, but... I've got a question. 16% of my total  
> output bandwidth is ack-only packets. Isn't that kinda high?

Yes. It sucks. As does the fact that we send a lot of very small packets, 
which are then padded with random data and subjected to our huge per-packet 
overhead. Most obvious solutions to this are sufficiently large as to not be 
possible before 0.7.0.
> 
> In fact, even 8% for resends seems kinda high too, but I suppose that  
> does not mean 8% packet loss. The negative 'other' output is amusing  
> but not very useful ;)

Mine is positive at this moment in time.

Attachment: pgpGpD40Xc8uO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to