On Sunday 23 March 2008 21:14, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> Joel C. Salomon a écrit :
> 
> > An alternative could be to give the freenet daemon permission to
> > update itself, and decouple the package version from the freenet
> > release version.  That will require update-over-mandatory, or giving
> > the daemon the smarts to connect to freenetproject.org when needed.
> 
> IMHO, the update should be done over Freenet (as it is already). The
> package should just ease the first installation.
> 
> If Freenet becomes illegal (and I think it will), the update should keep
> working even if the official site is shut down.

If it does, we can provide apt-get-over-freenet. :)
> 
> Just my 2 cents.

Attachment: pgpkcFXFzGmPp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to