* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-14 22:31:50]: > On Monday 14 April 2008 03:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-14 02:44:11 +0000 (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19291 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys/FreenetURI.java > > Log: > > doh... even though it doesn't matter yet it might with other keytypes > > > > Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys/FreenetURI.java > > =================================================================== > > --- trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys/FreenetURI.java 2008-04-14 02:42:33 UTC > (rev 19290) > > +++ trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys/FreenetURI.java 2008-04-14 02:44:11 UTC > (rev 19291) > > @@ -643,10 +643,8 @@ > > dis.readFully(cryptoKey); > > // Number of bytes of extra depends on key type > > int extraLen; > > - if(type == CHK) > > + if((type == CHK) || (type == SSK)) > > extraLen = ClientCHK.EXTRA_LENGTH; > > - else //if(type == SSK) > > - extraLen = ClientSSK.EXTRA_LENGTH; > > Eh?!?!?!?! > > What are you doing here, apart from breaking FreenetURI?
Dunno what I had in mind, see r19344 > Obviously an SSK > needs ClientSSK.EXTRA_LENGTH and a CHK needs ClientCHK.EXTRA_LENGTH ... ??? They happen to be the same; it had no practical effect
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
