On Tuesday 15 April 2008 01:05, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: toad > > Date: 2008-04-14 19:28:21 +0000 (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19334 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java > > Log: > > Reinstate MIN_UPTIME change which was on 1139 but was then reverted with everything else. > > Shall we use 1 week instead of 2 days? > Weekend-only nodes need some punishment as well.
Perhaps. We'd have to temporarily reduce the threshold if we did that, or increase the sample period gradually. It's not about punishment, it's about getting enough redundancy. If a node is down too often, we need the data stored on its neighbours as well - if they are sinks, ignoring the down node. > > > Regards, > Daniel Cheng
pgp7ffDX6JZ6b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
