two messages: --------------------------------------------------------
bad PR for freenet on Slashdot From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday 26 Apr 2008 15:04:39 Groups: freenet Followup-To: freenet default indexes giving Freenet some bad PR on slashdot: >> http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/04/25/1429232.shtml >> >> Every six months or so I re-install Freenet to see if the performance >> has gotten any better. Every time, I look at each of the pre- >> configured index pages to see what people are posting these days. Not >> once - never - have I seen childporn in any of those indexes. >> >> There's a simple explanation for all the people who talk about how >> Freenet is saturated with kiddy porn: they're either repeating a >> stupid meme that they know nothing about, or they've gone looking and >> found something. Which group are you in? > > With only 3 click from one of the pre-configured index page you can get > some. If I remember correctly: > - take the IA archive (this index is done by a crawler and not by > hand like the others) > - In the index on the left, select the porn category (i think) > - Search for Kindergarden > > Unfortunately there is some others in this same list... :( ----------------------------------------------------- Re: bad PR for freenet on Slashdot From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday 26 Apr 2008 15:57:50 Groups: freenet Followup-To: freenet References: 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> [Childporn] >> With only 3 click from one of the pre-configured index page you can get >> some. [...] With tor you can get illegal stuff in 2 clicks from the wikipedia entry for tor. Just follow core.onion and you get a link in the in the top bar. Last checked a few day ago. I don't see the /. folks bashing tor the same way as they do freenet. Double standards? ginger
pgpLsMNGkRZhu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
