* Florent Daignière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-18 06:09:15]: > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 14:44:27]: > > > On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote: > > > * Florent Daignière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: > > > > > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: > > > > > > > > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he > > > > > might > > want > > > > > to review this before I apply it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that > > > > need updating :/ > > > > > > > > See #74 > > > > > > http://download.intel.com/design/processor/applnots/24161832.pdf > > > > > http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/25481.pdf > > > > > > Here are the CPUID codes if you want to update them. > > > > > So should we or shouldn't we apply yongjhen's patch? > > I think that applying that patch instead of updating the whole set of codes > is not the way to go... > > If we were really after performances we would recompile the native > libraries with the new libgmp... which has performances boost on that > kind of (recent) processors.
Any progress ? Did you fill a ticket in for that issue ?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
