* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-01 19:31:35]: > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 17:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-07-22 16:52:25 +0000 (Tue, 22 Jul 2008) > > New Revision: 21320 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeDispatcher.java > > Log: > > Implement the FOAF-attack-mitigation hack > > IMHO we should accept the new location but ignore the FOAF locations, no? > >
It can't happen from a genuine node; imho it makes sense to prune that node out of routing altogether (and that's what happens as a side effect of not accepting any location from it).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
