* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-29 23:17:01]: > On Wednesday 29 October 2008 21:14, Florent Daignière wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-29 13:30:48]: > > > > > On Wednesday 29 October 2008 03:50, Florent Daignière wrote: > > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-29 00:12:24]: > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > > > Date: 2008-10-28 19:47:26 +0000 (Tue, 28 Oct 2008) > > > > > > New Revision: 23162 > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified: > > > > > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/ArchiveManager.java > > > > > > Log: > > > > > > fix bug #2667: Trunk: many old sites seem unretrievable > > > > > > > > > > Why is this necessary? What if a site went to a zip and then got > gzipped > > > on > > > > > top? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'cause of the stupid metadata format you've chosen :) > > > > > > > > compressionType = 0 is GZIP... and that happens to be the default, > > > > meaning that uncompressed ZIPs are/were advertizing ZIP+GZIP > > > > > > But we explicitly set -1 if it's not compressed ... so are you saying > > > that > > > ZIPs were never compressed with gzip, so there's no problem? > > > > No, we weren't setting it to -1; read the code you wrote ;) > > > Doh. Well, the question is, are some freesites gzipped zips and some > non-gzipped zips, with no metadata difference? Or are they all non-gzipped > zips?
They are all non-gzipped zips except a few inserted with unreleased code.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
