On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Florent Daigniere <[email protected]> wrote: > Yay, more alchemy!
I agree (assuming you intended that sarcastically ;-) This is straying into total alchemy territory. We need a proper rationale for whatever we set the limit to before we start messing with it based on guesswork. > What's the reason why we are considering to raise the limit again? It's > not the top-priority on the uservoice thingy anymore. Anyway, I remain > convinced that ~50 votes is irrelevant (especially when we consider that > a single user can give 3 voices to the same task!) and that we shouldn't > set priorities depending on what some "vocal" users are saying. Not exclusively, but it should be a consideration. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: [email protected] Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674 _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
