Matthew Toseland wrote:
> All browsers suck for our purposes: there are just too many ways to break 
> security, and too many performance caveats. IMHO we have moved on from that 
> debate.
> 
> The main problem with a firefox plugin/extension is that websites may be able 
> to probe specific Freenet URLs, e.g. via the img src/onLoad trick, or using 
> CSS link:visited, or some variation on the various port scanning exploits. 
> Hence my suspicion that we may be better off with an XULRunner-based app?

Have a look at mozswing, it wraps xulrunner as a Swing component.
LimeWire 5 uses it as an embedded browser. Eclipse also wraps xulrunner
in Java for its help browser, though I don't know how.

Cheers,
Michael
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to