On Tuesday 31 March 2009 17:26:05 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:51 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Author: infinity0
> > Date: 2009-03-30 23:51:44 +0000 (Mon, 30 Mar 2009)
> > New Revision: 26260
> >
> > Modified:
> [..]
> >  JNIEXPORT void JNICALL 
Java_com_onionnetworks_fec_Native16Code_nativeDecode
> > -  (JNIEnv *, jobject, jint, jobjectArray, jintArray, jintArray, jint, 
jint);
> > +  (JNIEnv *, jobject, jlong, jobjectArray, jintArray, jintArray, jint, 
jint);
> >
> 
> This is a ABI-incompatable change.
> Make sure _ALL_ binary are updated before release.
> 
> the x86 linux and x86 windows binary are outdated, as of this writing.

This is bad. Everything, including the auto-update, relies on FEC. Hopefully 
it will fall back on the pure java version of FEC, but is this change 
absolutely vital? For 32-bit i.e. could we create a separate ABI for 64-bit 
decodes?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to