On Friday 08 May 2009 12:40:32 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 03:18:07 Juiceman wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Zero3 wrote: > >>>> Juiceman skrev: > >>>>> Here is a patch for a new version of the Windows update script. > >>>>> Please commit since that svn directory is restricted. I've tested it > >>>>> extensively on my XP machine. > >>>>> This should handle the new installer start/stop.exe while still being > >>>>> compatible with current installs. It will need to be made to handle > >>>>> the new node service ID the new installer creates. > >>>>> It also still needs some Vista functionality. > >> Here is a further revision of the update script. Mostly error > >> handling, beautification. Please commit. > > > > I have applied this for the new wininstaller. Is it 100% Vista compatible? In > > particular, will it RunAs itself in order to self-escalate on Vista? > > Note that the update.cmd script doesn't need to (and wouldn't even be > able to) escalate itself. It should have write access to the files > already (inherited from the user running the script), and the start/stop > scripts handle escalation themselves.
So it should just work? Unless the user runs it from a user other than the one they installed as? I thought we created a user for Freenet, are the files writable by both the installing user and the freenet user?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
