On Tuesday 12 May 2009 00:45:54 Matthew Toseland wrote: > commit f86448d51c2e3248e1dfec513eefde50902aac30 > Author: Daniel Cheng (鄭郁邦) <[email protected]> > Date: Fri May 8 21:04:28 2009 +0800 > > FreenetStore: Simplify code, remove "overwrite" parameter > > This parameter is always "false". > (Except when doing BDB->SaltedHash migration, which does not have to > overwrite) > > > The reason I introduced the overwrite parameter was that when we send an SSK > insert and get a DataFound with different data, we should not only propagate > the data downstream, but also replace our local copy of it. However > apparently I never implemented this. Is it a good idea? > Looks like we do store the collided data for a local insert (NodeClientCore.java:XXX we have collided), but not for a remote one. Except that a bug prevents the former from working. So we need to fix getBlock(). Ok...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
