Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like >> these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between >> nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is >> purely peer to peer, in which case you need to look at the other nodes' >> connections as well and/or the timing. > > Is a steganography transport plugin planned? >
Yes, but that's long term stuff. The important bit is the plugin system. Stego transports shouldn't be bundled by default otherwise they become part of the protocol and that defeats the purpose. NextGen$ _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
