On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:10:42 Mike Bush wrote: > I have been watching this debate an I was wondering whether it could > help to have 2 sets of trust values for each identity in a trust list, > this could mean you could mark an identity as spamming or that I don't > want to see these posts again as i find them objectionable.
This is what Credence did in the end for spam detection on Gnutella, so it
might fit the human psyche :)
People got the option to say "that's bad quality or misleading", "I don't like
it" or "that's spam".
For messages that could be
* "that ID posts spam"
* "that ID posts crap"
The first can easily be reviewed, the second is subjective. That would give a
soft group censorship option, but give the useful spam detection to everyone.
Best wishes,
Arne
PS: Yes, I mostly just tried to clarify Mikes post for me. I hope the mail's
useful to you nontheless.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
