(Could we eliminate the "...1223..." all together? Isn't this an internal reference anyway? How about adding "1223" to the file info rather than the name?)
-Brendan
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Devl Digest, Vol 46, Issue 38
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, July 21, 2009 8:00 am
To: [email protected]
Send Devl mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Devl digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Installer file name (xor)
2. Re: UnsupportedClassVersion (xor)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:41:39 +0200
From: xor <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Installer file name
To: Discussion of development issues <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 02:22:55 Juiceman wrote:
> Currently we distribute our installer using a name such as
> FreenetInstaller-1223.exe but we call it 0.7.5 I suggest we use the
> nomenclature FreenetInstaller-0.7.5.1223.exe that is more in line with
> what appears to be standard amongst many applications.
>
> Thoughts?
Agreed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090721/c6e1c18a/attachment.pgp
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:48:26 +0200
From: xor <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] UnsupportedClassVersion
To: Discussion of development issues <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Saturday 18 July 2009 04:51:51 Ian Clarke wrote:
> Currently seeing this with the current testing build on a mac:
>
> The specified plugin
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/plugins/next-build/Freetalk.jarco
>uld not be loaded: unexpected error while plugin loading
> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file
> Freenet reports the following JVM info:
>
> Java Version: 1.5.0_19
>
> Although I do have Java 1.6 on my machine (and Java 1.5).
>
> Ian.
Recently I added some code to the node which Freetalk needs. This code has not
been deployed with 1223 yet, so maybe that's the problem.
Further, the builds of Freetalk which I'm seeing in alpha/plugins are very
outdated - toad didn't have time for reviewing the recent changes yet.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090721/1376fc2a/attachment.pgp
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
End of Devl Digest, Vol 46, Issue 38
************************************
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
