IMHO the best way to handle this is to keep a week reference to the PeerNode, 
so we can display the current name of the node which sent the message, no?

Thinking particularly of 0f68ca45ef5521fc9b5672053f6c04bf80ae0c7f - why do we 
need to parse it out of the SFS, don't we already know the node that sent the 
message?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to