On Saturday 24 October 2009 19:30:09 zero3 wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:51:56 +0100, Matthew Toseland > <[email protected]> wrote: > > WELCOME SCREEN: > > IMHO: Remove it. If needed, add a "Configure manually" button in the corner > of the rest of the wizard pages. 1 click saved.
Yeah, that's my inclination too, glad to see we agree. > > > If we are browsing in incognito mode, we have a shorter warning: > > IMHO: Don't bother the user when he is doing the right thing. He is safe, > so let him in without questions. 1 click saved. Problem is it is hard to impossible to reliably detect when he is doing the *wrong* thing. Until we have a custom browser with non-localhost url's, we need the user to be aware of the issue? > > > Unfortunately starting Chrome with the incognito flag does not reliably > > ensure the window is opened in incognito mode - if Chrome is already > > running, it will open it in a non-incognito window/tab. So at the moment > > this is turned off. So afaics we are waiting for Google to fix it? > Firefox > > is likely to have similar issues based on my experience with profiles, > > although it may be possible to work around that with -no-remote. Does > FF3.5 > > have an equivalent of incognito mode? > > We are indeed waiting for Google to fix it. I'm keeping an eye on their bug > tracker. Regarding FF, we are awaiting a command line option to use private > browsing which will be implemented in 3.6 > (https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Command_Line_Options#-private). Ok. > > > AUTO UPDATE AND PLUGINS > > IMHO: Default to autoupdate without asking (on Windows and Mac - should be > off on Linux when installed from a package). Nodes will quickly be locked > out of the network if they don't update, rendering their nodes useless. 1 > click saved. Packages are a separate issue, yes. However the real question here is UPnP and STUN, isn't it? > > > WELCOME: > > IMHO: Remove this page and show it as some kind of status message on the > fproxy main page. 1 click saved. As a dismissable alert which shows only once, perhaps...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
