Ian Clarke wrote: > That being said, I think the key question is still: what do we gain by > dropping 1.5 compatibility?
IMHO, for what it's worth: I'm not qualified to tell exactly what kind of new stuff 1.6 introduced, but I don't think we should fall behind upstream. If 1.5 is now end-of-life, we should already have moved to 1.6, which has been out since late 2006. I don't think supporting a minority of users with hopelessly outdated systems justifies holding back development. - Zero _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
