On Tuesday 09 March 2010 22:21:10 xor wrote: > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:55:55 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > This message is signed with my new gpg key. This is used for my emails and > > for signing many downloads. The old key frequently got bad signature errors > > because it was set to use SHA1 but it was using SHA256 as per my config > > (since SHA1 is known broken). Please could somebody who has been seeing bad > > signatures verify this one? Thanks. > > After it has confirmed to work please tell us where we can get a copy of the > new key which is signed by the old one... > The signature should be on the key on the key servers.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
