On 03/25/2010 08:57 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > On 03/25/2010 08:43 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: >> Also I think that your notion of “a shared branch that a lot of people can >> commit to” is slightly flawed. Everybody commits into their own repository. >> There _is_ no “shared branch.” > > My point is that there should be (and the only way to do that is to have a > shared repository, because only repositories grant access). It's tedious to > create a new branch just to do a one-off bug fix, and tedious to one-commit > pulls from 5 separate branches. >
To this end, how about this - for each subproject "project", have 2 repos, - project - project-shared "project" is the main repo that people fork, and which reviewed code is pulled into. "project-shared" is a repo which more people can commit to, with these commits being pulled into "project" just like another fork? X _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
