On Saturday 08 Jun 2013 01:13:09 Steve Dougherty wrote: > I've been working on an initial implementation of pulling from WoT > identities. digger3 was kind enough to add a feature to LCWoT to allow > searching for identities by partial nickname and key. WoT requires the > full key. > > That is to say, one can pull with `hg fn-pull operhiem1/reponame.R1/4` > > Pull support is currently incomplete, as it only looks up the request > key from WoT, and not the repo path and current edition. That last > part is what I plan to start next week. That makes the goal something > like `hg fn-pull operhiem1/reponame`. > > It's not clear to me why Infocalypse does not store its configuration > in configuration files within each repository. Perhaps it's for > security purposes in that it allows storing only a single > configuration file securely, instead of one in each repo? It makes > things more fragile in that settings are based on the repo path. I'd > also be interested in adding semantically meaningful key classes > instead of duplicate string manipulation. > > Matthew mentioned that WoT inserts the identity once a day, which > means that as long as someone keeps their node online enough for this > to happen, storing all the repository paths in the WoT identity itself > might be viable. I still like the conceptual separation of a different > key. To do otherwise makes the WoT identity a large undifferentiated > repository.
Yes IMHO it is essential that we allow different repo names within a single identity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
