-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/08/2013 06:44 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Saturday 08 Jun 2013 01:13:09 Steve Dougherty wrote:
>> I've been working on an initial implementation of pulling from
>> WoT identities. digger3 was kind enough to add a feature to LCWoT
>> to allow searching for identities by partial nickname and key.
>> WoT requires the full key.
>> 
>> That is to say, one can pull with `hg fn-pull 
>> operhiem1/reponame.R1/4`
>> 
>> Pull support is currently incomplete, as it only looks up the 
>> request key from WoT, and not the repo path and current edition. 
>> That last part is what I plan to start next week. That makes the 
>> goal something like `hg fn-pull operhiem1/reponame`.
>> 
>> It's not clear to me why Infocalypse does not store its 
>> configuration in configuration files within each repository. 
>> Perhaps it's for security purposes in that it allows storing only
>> a single configuration file securely, instead of one in each
>> repo? It makes things more fragile in that settings are based on
>> the repo path. I'd also be interested in adding semantically
>> meaningful key classes instead of duplicate string manipulation.
>> 
>> Matthew mentioned that WoT inserts the identity once a day, which
>>  means that as long as someone keeps their node online enough
>> for this to happen, storing all the repository paths in the WoT 
>> identity itself might be viable. I still like the conceptual 
>> separation of a different key. To do otherwise makes the WoT 
>> identity a large undifferentiated repository.
> 
> Yes IMHO it is essential that we allow different repo names within
> a single identity.

I didn't intend to imply a scheme in which that was not possible.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=Vv9Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to