On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 15:12 +0200, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 05:55 +0200, xor wrote: > > On Friday, June 20, 2014 10:30:31 PM Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > On 20/06/14 19:59, xor wrote: > > So can we get rid of this, if only at least for WOT? > > What about you maintain a (single) repository under your userid on > github... and FPI has a single repository that a RM updates whenever > your code is deployed (pushing one of the signed tags from your > repository)?
Updated proposal after talking about it on IRC: Each sub-project hosted by FPI has a "Maintainer" The sub-project's repositories are hosted under the FPI banner. The only person pushing to it is the Maintainer; stuff gets in through pull-requests when and in the order he says so. Fred's RM maintain push rights to the said repository but the convention is that they don't use them except to tag (and sign!) what they have reviewed/are shipping. In WoT and Freetalk's case (should you agree to it), you would be the Maintainer. Makes sense? Would you be happy with something like that? Obviously the repositories names would be stripped from -official and -staging. PS: there's at least 11 persons with push rights on WoT-staging atm, hence my reluctance to just rename it
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
