On 09/16/2014 01:25 PM, David Roden wrote:
> On 16.09.2014, at 05:42, Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Java artifacts can have minimum Java version requirements. From
>> what I've been able to find Java .class files do not have
>> standardized "target version" information, so this would need to be
>> in the jar MANIFEST.
> 
> Class files do contain major and minor version (see
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-4.html) of the
> target they are compiled for but we probably don’t want to check
> every class file for that information.

Ah, okay. It doesn't seem likely to be straightforward to do either.

>> Thoughts?
> 
> All in all: that sounds awesome. I’m not sure though whether I fully
> understand what is required for the update channel
> creator/maintainer; can you give some details on an example
> workflow?

I'm not sure if this is what you mean, but:

1) build artifacts
2) insert artifacts with signatures
3) ask other signers to verify artifacts and insert signatures
4) insert manifest / definition

> Also, is this usable for plugins, too?

It seems desirable to have it generic enough to do so, but I'm not sure
it's in the initial scope.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to