On 19/11/14 02:49, Steve Dougherty wrote: > Shall we set a date for reformatting the codebase to follow (at least > cosmetically) Google's Java style guide, updating the Eclipse project, > and adding an IntelliJ IDEA one? To do otherwise seems liable to leave > the codebase with a mish-mash of coding styles interminably. > > What bodies of code are pending that we want merged? I can try to get > them in before a deadline so that this will actually happen. > > * Hashing API [0] > * Transport plugins [1] No way is this going in quickly. Sorry, it's just too big and too complex and affects too much core stuff.
And it has major concurrency issues and various other problems that still need fixing. > Maybe: > > * Windows IO priority [2]. The part touching existing code is minimal so > it should be easy to adapt. > > Probably not: > > * Darknet app support in core [3]. This should have been a plugin - it's > a shame we didn't speak up about our reservations at the start of its > development, but this is really not appropriate functionality for the > core code. > > Anything else I'm missing? There is lots more old code to think about merging, e.g. an ogg filter. How much harder does auto-reformatting make merging older stuff? > > - Steve > > [0] https://github.com/freenet/fred/pull/258 > [1] https://github.com/freenet/fred/tree/chetan-transports > [2] https://github.com/freenet/fred/pull/29 > [3] https://github.com/freenet/fred/pull/197
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
