Am Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, 08:05:22 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Thoughts? I think youre right in your analysis, that fproxy should look and feel more modern. To address this, there’s already the winterface which also decouples UI from the core. It is already partially usable and looks really nice, but it’s not complete enough to replace fproxy for any of our core workflows.
These tasks are still what’s needed: https://d6.gnutella2.info/freenet/USK@um4cEaaGWlgdAK8gAFDJrqY2eiSM3fHxiPfMTu89coE,m2rG6gU~ISukN3S3qJtNwVxXr0giCtHvu8BPz605FxE,AQACAAE/winterface-deadlines/6/#sec-1-2 Winterface: https://github.com/ArneBab/Winterface So there were already great steps towards a nice UI, but (as so often in Freenet) the last few steps are missing to make it usable (I did not do that work either, so please don’t take this as blaming someone. It’s just an observation: Most of the things we have severly lack polish). Best wishes, Arne -- 1w6 sie zu achten, sie alle zu finden, in Spiele zu leiten und sacht zu verbinden. → http://1w6.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl