Am Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, 08:05:22 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> Thoughts?

I think youre right in your analysis, that fproxy should look and feel
more modern. To address this, there’s already the winterface which
also decouples UI from the core. It is already partially usable and
looks really nice, but it’s not complete enough to replace fproxy for
any of our core workflows.

These tasks are still what’s needed:
https://d6.gnutella2.info/freenet/USK@um4cEaaGWlgdAK8gAFDJrqY2eiSM3fHxiPfMTu89coE,m2rG6gU~ISukN3S3qJtNwVxXr0giCtHvu8BPz605FxE,AQACAAE/winterface-deadlines/6/#sec-1-2

Winterface: https://github.com/ArneBab/Winterface

So there were already great steps towards a nice UI, but (as so often
in Freenet) the last few steps are missing to make it usable (I did
not do that work either, so please don’t take this as blaming
someone. It’s just an observation: Most of the things we have severly
lack polish).

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
1w6 sie zu achten,
sie alle zu finden,
in Spiele zu leiten
und sacht zu verbinden.
→ http://1w6.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to