On 09/13/2015 01:50 PM, Victor Denisov wrote: >> I have been using Semantic Versioning (http://semver.org/) on a few >> projects and found it to be a good approach. > > As a non-developer Freenet user, I can only express my wholehearted > support for this approach. Current versioning strategy is *extremely* > confusing to non-technical open source users accustomed to > <major>.<minor>.<patch> versioning (i.e., build 1468 contains major, > non-backwards compatible changes, and yet it is only separated by a > single build number from a previous version). > > Also, projects with major version not being incremented for what? 8 > years now, correct? - are often perceived as abandoned, which isn't what > Freenet is probably looking for.
Currently 7 is the minor version and 0 the major, but indeed to both. Thoughts on moving to semantic versioning? What version would the next release be? How difficult will it be to adapt the auto-update system from its current form of lock-step with the build number?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
