On 10/16/15 07:20, Zlatin Balevsky wrote: >> But there are other trends that might favour us, e.g. cheap but powerful > router boxes, Raspberry Pi / >> Arduino hobbyist stuff etc. > > Every trend can bring more volunteers passionate about it, so all venues > are worth pursuing :)
This is an area in which freenet could be really suited for. Projects like: https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox and integration with tails could make freenet a lot more usable, "popular" and quell some of the tor suggestions. > Is "pretending that Opennet can work" still the official project's > line? In regards to this I must protest. I don't have any cyberpunk friends :( > Is pretending that average humans will know enough Freenet users to make pure > Darknet work a reasonable estimate? > Is it acceptable to limit freedom of speech to those who have many friends? I've got to side with xor here > I think it's time for us all to take a step back and have a serious > conversation about where we are, and where we are going. I think this is the best thing to have happened to this project for a long time and the list activity shows how alive it still is. I don't think it needs any drastic changes but project direction and fund-raising is where we should be focussed IMHO. just my 2c, Dean
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
