On 25/10/15 00:46, dean wrote: > On 10/25/15 04:08, Ximin Luo wrote: >> On 23/10/15 08:54, dean wrote: >>> On 10/23/15 13:50, Steve Dougherty wrote: >>>> On 10/22/2015 06:09 PM, dean wrote: >>>> * I don't think v29 is preferable to contrib master. master is split >>>> into multiple jars, which is better and I'm hoping we can move to it. >>> >>> My thoughts on this were: The debian package should use exactly the same >>> code as everybody else does. Isn't contrib master considered untested? I >>> planned to trial contrib master in branch until freenet used contrib >>> master too. Am I being silly? Should I just use master? >>> >> >> The debian package is designed to work with contrib master, just use that. >> Freenet should move off the legacy contrib branch ASAP. >> > Starting on this now. >
Hey, wait. I have more comments to make. I also overhauled the existing repo and am waiting to get my commit access back before pushing it. I'll do that tomorrow, then you can continue to work on top of that. X -- GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
