Very much appreciated! On Dec 4, 2015 11:35 AM, "Bert Massop" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The circle plot shows the peer location, the histogram does not. We should > instead fix the histogram to show the peer locations. > > Should be 15 minutes of work at most, if I don't see a pull request by > tomorrow I'll file one. > > All the best, > Bert > Op 4 dec. 2015 17:29 schreef "Michael Grube" <[email protected]>: > > > If this graph is a measure of your distance from your peers we should > > reconsider the graph title. > > On Dec 4, 2015 11:25 AM, "Steve Dougherty" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 12/04/2015 11:20 AM, Bert Massop wrote: > > > > Also, the clusters all appear close to your respective node's > > locations, > > > as > > > > expected, and certainly not around 0.00 (which would be on the top or > > on > > > > the extreme right of the circle plot, I'm not reading the code at the > > > > moment). > > > > > > > > Again, I see no reason to worry. > > > > > > Oh, okay. That makes sense. I will say that naming a distance plot > "Peer > > > Location Distribution" is extraordinarily misleading. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Devl mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [email protected] > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
