On 04/02/16 20:32, Ian Clarke wrote: > I've been reading about Bitcoin Contracts > <http://go.toutapp.com/90b05fd2ceb9921d1d>, and I'm surprised by the > similarity between these and, not just SSKs, but particularly the original > proposal for SSKs <http://go.toutapp.com/47378f027c07c02552> from way back > in June 2000, which involved a stack based language with cryptographic > primitives, just like the language used for Bitcoin contracts. > > I don't know if the Bitcoin approach was inspired by SSKs at all, I suspect > more likely independent reinvention to solve a similar problem.
Perhaps. It's relevant to the PSKs discussion. In practice what you can do with Bitcoin script is severely restricted by the miners... but there is no obvious reason for this that would also apply to Freenet key verification.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
