On 15/03/16 12:22, charles wrote: > On 3/14/16 1:04 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On 14/03/16 09:48, Florent Daigniere wrote: >>> On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 22:44 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: >>>> On 03/12/2016 12:40 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>>>> [email protected] writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Have a look at this: https://www.similarweb.com/website/freenetpr >>>>>> oject.org >>>>>> Looks pretty good. It's new that China is in the TOP 5 of >>>>>> visitors splitted by origins... >>>>> 200k visitors per month is pretty good, but we’re still stuck at >>>>> 10k >>>>> users. These are things we can fix, though it’s not easy to really >>>>> get >>>>> right. >>>> Actually this number is off by an order of magnitude from what our >>>> piwik >>>> [0] server log analysis lists. (Run on the server, not third party.) >>>> That lists closer to 30k per month, and I'm not even sure it's able >>>> to >>>> exclude bots properly because we don't log IPs. >>>> >>> visitors != potential users != users who will successfully install != >>> users who might consider staying != users who will stay >>> >>> How many of these are running windows? >>> >>> We setup a 32bit JVM that will be "upgraded" to 64bit, breaking freenet >>> in the process... This has been going on for a few months now. Fixing >>> it is non-trivial and definitely requires a release... it won't happen >>> until the build after the next one. >>> >>> Florent >> So Oracle are properly supporting the 64-bit JVM now? Clearly this will >> need a wrapper upgrade, and we'll have to build it ourselves... >> > Oracle is auto updating 32bit windows installs to 64bit. I've tried > building the version of wrapper in freenet-ext v29 on windows 7, but > kept running into problems since it was designed to build on win XP. I > have successfully built a new version of wrapper on it's own in win 7, > but have not gotten a chance to try building with the latest version of > freenet-ext. I also haven't gotten a chance to think about how to best > integrate the win64 build file into freenet-ext v50. We could just move > wrapper from "upstream source" to "mirrored source" as per the Readme, > but not sure if that is the best option. > > -Charles
There shouldn't be a problem with freenet-ext.jar, we can and do ship more up to date binaries with it? As for the rest... good luck... :|
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
