On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> wrote: > > I don’t think that’s a fair assessment — Mediawiki syntax is pretty > decent and nicely full-featured — and I don’t think that markup matters > that much in this. Markdown is nice, but the difference isn’t that big > (I used to think different but changed my stance with experience). > > Transitioning simply is a lot of very boring work, and there are lots of > corner cases which don’t work by default. >
I acknowledge that it might not be easy, but you acknowledge that we didn't even complete the last wiki migration. Github is easy to use, and its wiki syntax is very familiar to people. I think that will be a better place for us to be ultimately. I really dislike the idea of us running our own web servers, we're just begging to be hacked or to hit a scalability wall. If volunteers are unwilling to do it, then we could pick the most important pages and pay someone to migrate them. People competent in that kind of work can be hired quite cheaply. Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
