On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:26:50 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:43:26 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> >> Don’t bother too much. I have all I found in csvs which are much easier
> >> to work with.
> >> 
> >> I uploaded a tarball with the votes and cost-estimates along with an
> > 
> >> evaluation tool:
> > Arne,
> > 
> > it is not fun for me to volunteer days on something while neglecting my
> > personal duties only to wake up to someone saying "throw away your
> > existing
> > work, I finished it already!"; especially considering I had asked you to
> > please not do this.
> 
> You asked me not to do this while the poll is open.
> 
> I asked explicitly whether it’s closed and only posted the results after
> you said that the poll is closed.

Well it seems you misunderstood me then, because that is not what I said or at 
least intended to say:

[Tuesday, September 20, 2016] [10:43:07 PM]
<xor-freenet> ArneBab: i slightly agree with nextgens. it'd be nice if you 
could wait for the main evaluation of poll results which i'm working on before 
you publish your own evaluation.   i mean you're free to speak whatever you 
want but it's sort of derailing things if we constantly get threads on devl 
which want to push the poll off its railways... we all know that those threads 
end up in huge discussions which block people from reaching real decisons

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to