Thanks for the update! On Fri, Dec 30, 2016, 5:34 PM Dan Roberts <ademan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately I didn't find much time between work and three different sets > of family, but I believe I can carve out time this weekend. I expect a very > low key new years. I have a prospective solution to my biggest pelican > concern that I'm very happy with, I'll try to update again this weekend. > > Thanks, > Dan > > On Dec 25, 2016 3:24 PM, "Ian Clarke" <i...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > Thanks for the update Dan, merry xmas. > > > > Ian Clarke > > Founder, The Freenet Project > > Email: i...@freenetproject.org > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 5:02 PM, Dan Roberts ademan...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> I'm trying to find some time to fully exercise the parts of pelican we > >> need. I still have some concerns and issues I ran into last weekend in > my > >> initial exploration, but I'm hopeful they're not showstoppers. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Dan > >> > >> On Dec 23, 2016 11:34 AM, "Ian Clarke" <i...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hey guys, this conversation seems to have died. > >> > >> Florent/Dan, are you guys on the same page about how we should proceed? > >> > >> Ian. > >> > >> Ian Clarke > >> Founder, The Freenet Project > >> Email: i...@freenetproject.org > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 5:09 PM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 4:18 PM, Florent Daigniere > >> nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 10:44 -0800, Dan Roberts wrote: > >> > >> > It is my impression that retaining our transifex translations is a > >> > >> > requirement. > >> > >> > >> I don't think so (we are supposed to re-write/de-clutter the content!); > >> > >> > >> I agree, I the content on the main website must be simplified > >> dramatically relative to what we have now, focussing on the needs of > those > >> interested in downloading and using Freenet, and donating to the > project. > >> This is a commonly used approach for consumer-facing open source > software > >> (eg. https://getfirefox.com/), and I think we should emulate it. > >> > >> "Deeper" content, more relevant to researchers, or developers, should be > >> migrated to a separate wiki (perhaps hosted on Github) - although as an > >> interim measure we can keep the old site around on a different URL. Of > >> course we will provide links to it where appropriate from the main site > so > >> it is findable. > >> > >> The perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good. My inclination is to > get > >> the new site up ASAP, translations and content can catch up (and will be > >> much easier with a simplified website). I think with a website that > looks > >> really good it will also be a good motivator for people to contribute to > >> improve it. > >> > >> From a devops perspective, I think an ideal situation would be to have a > >> limited number of people that can merge pull-requests for the site (but > not > >> so limited that it proves to be a bottleneck), and then a merge to > master > >> results in an automatic roll-out of the improved site. > >> > >> Ian. > >> > >> Ian Clarke > >> Founder, The Freenet Project > >> Email: i...@freenetproject.org > >> > >> > >> > >> Ian Clarke > >> Founder, The Freenet Project > >> Email: i...@freenetproject.org > >> > >> > > > > Ian Clarke > > Founder, The Freenet Project > > Email: i...@freenetproject.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl@freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
