Thinking that we will not be forced to break protocol compatibility many times yet is wishfull thinking. There are still more unresolved then I care to think about (I have yet to see any particularly encouraging results out of Serapis).
Freenet will not be done in a couple of months. It will not be done in a year and a couple of months either. People who can't wait for that would best look elsewhere. On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:19:18PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > I would like to avoid a break in compatability if possible, and it > seems that we are very close to achieving this. Perhaps allowing 0.4 > to accept connections from 0.3 nodes if a configuration parameter is > set to true, and setting this to true by default in 0.4, but to false > by default in 0.5. > > On that subject, is there really any advantage of using this PK > mechanism over the current key-exchange algorithm? > > Ian. -- \oskar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 238 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000817/8409d2ac/attachment.pgp>
