Any form of typing is fine with me. The question is whether it should be value or field typing, though I would be inclined to make it easy and stick to value typing (declaring fields might be a little over complicated).
> In that case, maybe it would be better just to take another byte for a type > indicator. For example, S = string, N = number, B = boolean. Then we > wouldn't have to perform escaping and it would be more flexible if we > eventually wanted to add new types. e.g. > > Field1=Ssomestring > Field2=N3a372f83 > Field3=Btrue > > theo > > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev > _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
