> I personally can't see any downside to Freenet becoming part of GNU, > and I think it would lend us an extra air of credibility in the hacker > community.
I'm sure I'll be outvoted, and that's OK; but I want to state for the record that I do not agree with the goals and philosophy of the FSF, or with Mr. Stallman in particular. Any code I have written and will write in the future will be in the public domain, so it can be used in a GNU project--but it can also be used in fully commercial private-source projects, which I fully support. What happens to the present code (essentially none of which is mine) I'm not that concerned about, but I would at least like to guarantee that the spec document, the FAQ, and other documentation remain fully public domain. -- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
