> As I said - (wearing my user hat) we should cover the nasty details > (like baseline=blah&interval=blah&docname=blah) so that the users see: > * Lump of Freenet data they don't play with > * Possibly a DocName
There are standard parts of URLs the world over. You don't need to hide things in the URL. People are tempted to fiddle with URLs. URLs are either clicked on, in which case the user doesn't see them, or cut-and-pasted, in which case the user doesn't modify them, or typed in, in which case the user tries to reproduce them as exactly as possible. I see no usefulness in abandoning the standard URI syntax in order to make things more opaque. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
