On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:52:51PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > As I said - (wearing my user hat) we should cover the nasty details > > (like baseline=blah&interval=blah&docname=blah) so that the users see: > > * Lump of Freenet data they don't play with > > * Possibly a DocName
> Besides, the %-escaped format doesn't hide anything anymore than the ?& > format, so I don't see how these are arguements for the % format. So it > seems to me that if you're okay with the % format then you should be okay > with the ?& format. I'm fine with the ?& format. As for the URI cloking - that was me with my user hat on which is in mint-condition becuase it's never been used ;) AGL -- It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010406/38dd55ec/attachment.pgp>
