From: "Michael Carmack" <[email protected]> > Are the version numbers being chosen to satisfy logic or psychology? > Whereas a jump to 0.3.8.2 "feels" less significant than a jump to > 0.3.9 and one could argue for choosing to version this way, I'm not > sure it's really that useful developers or users. A more logical > versioning scheme might use major/minor/subminor numbers, where > the major number gets incremented when backwards compatibility is > broken, the minor number gets incremented when new features are added
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version number Michael Carmack
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version number Stefan Reich
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version number Steven Hazel
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version number Michael Carmack
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version number Michael Carmack
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version numb... Steven Hazel
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version numb... Michael Carmack
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version ... Steven Hazel
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version ... Tavin Cole
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / ver... Michael Carmack
- [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version ... Oskar Sandberg
