Michael Carmack <karmak at w3.org> writes: > Actually, the reason I emailed this to the list was because I > thought I saw some debate over whether the next release should be > called 0.3.8.2 or 0.3.9. Using a major.minor.subminor versioning > scheme I wouldn't expect there to be any room for such debates. > > I tend to skim some of my emails though, so perhaps I misunderstood > what was being discussed.
It was a relative newbie failing to understand our confusing supermajor number scheme. -S _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Sat Apr 7 16:34:53 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA06171 for <danello at danky.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:34:52 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A9358078; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 13:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from protactinium (protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9C857D9C for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 13:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [213.1.150.169] (helo=zen) by protactinium with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14lz2Z-0001n7-00 for devl at freenetproject.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 21:10:35 +0100 Received: from agl by zen with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14lzGq-00016X-00 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 21:25:20 +0100 From: Adam Langley <[email protected]> To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Re: freegle key indices
