> > Parsing and modifying HTML is messy. I'm still of the opinion that FProxy > > should not modify any HTML, only warn you of possibly bad things. > Fproxy doesn't modify any html. The content author is responsible for ripping > off the leading "http://"; in their href's and replacing it with > "CHECKED__JUMP".
This is ugly and a pain for publishers to have to specially code their pages for Freenet. However, if people want to do this and there's not a technically better solution, then I see no reason not to make it an option (other than that it's ugly, which isn't a reason unless someone can think of a prettier alternative, beauty being relative and all).
