> My problem with this philosophy is that it is misleading. If I have a
> node that needs to delete X bytes of data, it doesn't mean all of
> freenet is totally overloaded. It just means my own node is out of
> space. The question is, how does my node find another node that can
> spare those X bytes for my file? If my node contains the only copy of
> the data, it is still deleted needlessly.
This sounds like a Good Thing to me. There are some 20GB freenet nodes
out
there playing marbles while their stores sit with only a few GB in use. Why
