From: "toad" <[email protected]> > Randomized exponential insertion? Just going 2,4,8,... suggests easy DoS :)
Yeah, must be randomized. Jan - I rediscovered your suggestion in my mailbox (you suggested keyword files split by first letter). It would be feasible, but I think the "Lucene method" is simpler to implement and scales better. (Searching for parts of keywords might be much harder to implement with Lucene though...) -Stefan _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 17 17:36:17 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA11823 for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:20:43 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA28358183; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from moe.cc.utexas.edu (moe.cc.utexas.edu [128.83.42.2]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B084A57FE6 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (blanu at localhost) by moe.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/cc-uts-client-1.11) with ESMTP id OAA18697 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:55:52 -0500 (CDT)
