>From Michael Carmack <karmak at w3.org> > >> Freedom of Speech *is* about not preventing people from consuming >> information that they *do* want to consume. > >Suppose I were to make a public request that any content that >was critical of human rights violations in China be hidden away >in a similar fashion? It would be a suggestion made in the best >interest of the people, of course. > >m. >
If the volume of the human rights stuff were sufficient to get in the way of finding other stuff (porn?), I wouldn't see any problem with a "no human
